The website does not provide any link to the source code or it’s license.
Does anyone have some details about sendent?
If it is commercial and closed source then it should not be part of the project at Transifex IMHO.
I locked the resource at Transifex until we have some details about it.
At the website of sendent they write about a Partnership with Nextcloud. @jospoortvliet Do you have any knowledge about code and license?
Yes. I started translating but stopped after a few text strings about the license and seeing the home page of the app. I just wanted to contact you about this. In my opinion, if it is a commercial project, it should not appear for volunteer translators.
Free software can be commercial, too (for example the Deck, Notes and News Android app).
I therefore would be glad if the decision was based on the license of the code.
I am the developer behind the Outlook plugin itself (Sendent) and worked on it ever since the beginning of the Outlook integration.
We recently made the Nextcloud app translateable. That app of course is AGPLv3.
Regarding the Outlook client itself that is not part of the Transifex translations. We still and will always offer a free version. Currently we are at v3 but the feature-set is the same as offered initially in 2017: Secure Outlook add-in is now available for testing in free-as-in-beer version. For now we are keeping that code closed-source.
The app it firstly meant as a GPO for all the connected clients. The general settings work (language, cursor location, add date to path, debug mode) and at the very bottom you will find the retention assistant. Now this is probably not well documented, but basically it will automatically clean-up all your shares that have expired after an X amount of days. This works with the free versions as well.
As soon as this is done, I will unlock the resource on Transifex again and the translators will get going .
It’s a pity that the Outlook add-on is not open source .
EDIT:
I just read your terms and conditions and from my understanding this document does not reflect the AGPL v3 licence for the server app as well. Do you agree?
.
.
Done.