a.) why?
b.) perhaps the sender want move it in future in another path
(my example is in a path named with the month “July” and nobody must know it)
b.) perhaps the receiver move it in a own path without source pathes
(i think the receiver do not like my folder “July”)
a) I have a group folder shared within a group. In this group folder there is a subfolder which has to be shared with another user not member of the group. I want this person to see the full path to have the same structure as the group. THis can be achieved by creating a folder with the same name as the group folder and moving the shared subfolder into it. But maybe there is a simpler way to achieve this.
b (twice this is a general problem with shares. In general renaming a share does not rename it in the receivers filesystem, only the initial name is set. This is fine.
This is useful feature, I hope one day it will be default behaviour, or at least a choice.
a.) why?
To have identical structure on all systems. Example from CGI production: when master project file will be opened, it will be able to find and download all necessary supportive files like caches, textures, 3d models, and download them using virtual files feature.
b.) perhaps the sender want move it in future in another path
So it should be moved on every connected machine, and if it’s not shared folder, access will be lost.
b.) perhaps the receiver move it in a own path without source pathes
So it should be moved on every connected machine, and if it’s not shared folder access will be lost. This is managing issue, no need to resolve it on this level. To worn a user at max.