EDIT: never mind - has been corrected.
I see it on the homepage still. Just replied to it.
It was buried for a for a while - trust me. I’d say the guys are having a bit of a rethink about a slightly mishandled situation.
I’m sure there is not much of an issue here, but it needs to be handled carefully, so as not to give the impression of behavior (however minor) that is antithetical to what we are trying to achieve.
In the interest of not diluting the discussion then I’ll point you back to that conversation for comments (including the one you just made) and lock this up.