during last months i developed a new app called Gantt-Projects. Now I would like to increase quality of that app.
To explain the situation: I am using Claude code to generate most of the code. I frequently let it check for maintainability, stability and security. But during the time the codebase grew so much that I would love to get comments from the community where I could improve the code.
So please get in contact with me if you are willing to lift this app on its next level.
So you look for people to review the code, or also to contribute?
Today it might be a bit better. But in the past, if you have a huge blob of AI written software, reviewing and cleaning it up manually you didn’t want to do that. Now it might have changed a bit, it depends a lot how people prompt their stuff, how they imply rules etc. and if the developers have the knowledge to double-check themselves is even better.
So you violate the terms and conditions of codeberg?
@tflidd, Yes to all your mentions. I am looking for others to contribute - no matter how. and yes, i am thinking about an alternative to codeberg but have not found any suitable, yet. github is not a real option. I was starting my AI project long before codeberg stated their opinion. So I will react on whatever will come and could even imaging hosting that stuff ion my own. Any Idea on that could be a first contribution
@JimmyKater: Yes I was surprised about their work, too, but i think my project-planning goeas far beyond Deck’s possibilities already. My approach is to organize the project top-down and integrate Deck as the operational layer with agile ideas. The goal is to combine classic PM timeline expectations with agile work setup and show parts that may get in conflict, adding ressource management for enterprises. I already asked for co-operation but have not got an answer, yet.
one more thought on that one: As far as i can say, the current code base is world-better, than anything i could have ever produced. structure is clean, coding guidelines are met and: documentation is far better than i ever did in the past. Dont get me wrong - i do not need some body to do the ugly work and clean it all up. I would like to have another eyes to look on how this project grows maybe with more nextcloud-dev experience than i have and inform me about possible pit-falls or even get me some ideas how to get better.
I do already have a couple of users bringing in feature ideas and bug reports but i donot wnat them to have to rely on my work only. Project Management is my passion and i am burning for souvereignity - both together created this app.
Yes, that is a good point and many apps lack support by different people. I’ll keep an eye on the deck development, perhaps even check with them (their chat: Nextcloud), how things can be best integrated.
I am looking for others to contribute - no matter how. and yes, i am thinking about an alternative to codeberg but have not found any suitable, yet. github is not a real option. I was starting my AI project long before codeberg stated their opinion. So I will react on whatever will come and could even imaging hosting that stuff ion my own. Any Idea on that could be a first contribution