Yeah, but that doesnât automatically make it crap.
First, there are plenty of people who actually like the Waffle menu. Second, there are probably even more people who simply donât care and adapt to the new workflow. And third, there are people who donât particularly like either approach. For example, here: [UX] Apps in a sidebar
That said, I agree with you that criticism should absolutely be allowed. But it can also be nuanced and respectful. More importantly, we shouldnât immediately assume bad faith or start throwing around terms like âenshittificationâ every time a decision doesnât match our personal preferences.
If you personally donât mind people coming to you, calling your work crap, then fair enough. But not everyone feels that way, and I donât think expecting a basic level of respect for their work doesnât make someone a âdelicate plant.â As the French say, le ton fait la musiqueâthe tone makes the music.
My main point, though, is that broad rants that lump ten unrelated issues together, even when theyâre directed at the technical or design decisions themselves rather than at the people behind them, are rarely productive.
Sure, in an ideal world there would always be options, configuration switches, or plugins. But as a developer, you know better than most that every additional option comes with additional maintenance costs.
I do agree with you, though: these days thereâs a tendency to ship major changes too early and let them mature in production, with users effectively acting as the final testing ground. Thatâs become a bit of an unfortunate trend.
So my advice to users would be: stay one major release behind whenever you can. In practice, the latest âstableâ Nextcloud release often feels more like a beta, at least during the first half of its release cycle. ![]()