Ah yes, dismiss with comedy gif. Interesting how many attempts are made to deflect in this thread.
If we want to assess your credibility on the matter, we need look no further than your claims in the other thread:
This is obvious nonsense, and will be shown as such if anyone ever actually succeeds in compiling it without the artificial restriction. When they’re not defending the 20 connection limit with this talking point, they’re boasting about how you can easily have 75 open connections per core, as compared to Collabora!
Check out this hatchet job article they wrote on the comparison to Collabora.
Here’s a quote.
Architecture of ONLYOFFICE, optimized before installed
Because we let your servers relax. Again, everything happens on a machine of a person who carelessly opened fifteen documents and is editing five of them simultaneously. Sure enough, the server takes responsibilities, but much less than if it would host an editor.
We keep the client and the server connected, but only to a minor, necessary extent. The practice shows that an average server with ONLYOFFICE running can afford 75 actively edited documents per core. Going back, while a hypothetical dual core machine with Collabora on can serve eight to ten users, ONLYOFFICE can take 150.