Remaining issues in NC 28.0.3 RC2

No, there is not an “open github issue”. I’m one of literally thousands of people who have brought this up (do a quick google for things such as “NC server is catastrophically / painfully / astonishingly / infeasibly slow” and you’ll find no shortage of people complaining that even over a LAN, and with no WAN at all, Xfer speeds are in the toilet.

I’m not opening a “github issue” either. “Open a github issue” is (and has been in my entire 35 years of OSS experience) code for “Please go away”. People who really want to deal with a users issue will either:

  1. Work out that it’s a prexisting problem and point them at a “github issue” that they’ve already created to help users out .
  2. Work out that this is a new problem, and work with the user to explore / document the issue, eventually either developing a fix or workaround, which can then be documented by opening an issue.

Theres no issue for Federation, either, because I havent opened one. I came to the forums to talk to people and ask questions. I do my best to also impart what knowledge I do have (you can easily see I’ve been helping others), and I do my best to not ask questions that have already been answered.

I’ve been here 8 days, and I’ve read over 400 posts, and made 30 odd.

I’m smart enough (and been doing IT stuff long enough) that I can see when I’ve done all the proper steps, only to find that it doesn’t work and that the reason is undocumented.

Thats WHY Ive come to ask for help here.

I’ve another thread re: federation - its here:

And another re: the photo app DOS - read here:

Until last night, preview concurrency was “whatever the default is” because I had assumed that the devs would select sensible defaults - either “not much”, or some heuristic, like “CPU cores -1 or 1 at minimum” or “cores/2 rounded up”, rather than the completely insane “infinity” which is the default.

I also had no idea there was an option for changing it until last night. No-one else has mentioned it to me until now, after I already found it.

Its certainly not mentioned in the setup guide, which is where it should be, since the defaults are insane, and guaranteed to DOS anything but a tricked-out gaming rig…

I am referring to the built in preview generator, although I’ve disabled that now and am using preview-generator.

If you select (as I’ve done) a max size preview of 256x256, then when you go to ACTUALLY look at your photos (ie. not just previews thumbnails), they look like total sh*t, because you get a scaled up 256 x “whatever” image, not the actual original.

Why? If I click on the thumbnail image, I WANT THE ORIGINAL (like anyone else would).

What this means is that I can either cripple my machine (ie. let the preview generator generate unlimited previews up to the 4K (!) defaults), because all my pictures are <4K, and so at least I’m guaranteed to always see them in full quality when I open them,

or I can run the preview-generator app (yes, I know its not in the base install) and have useable speed scrolling in Photos, etc., but then I can never see the images in full quality in the “Memories” app. (which I have to use, because “Photos” is so utterly CR*P that its useless in every way - Slow, hard to use, DoSes your server etc.)

What I want is for previews to never be >256x256, but for apps to ALWAYS open the original image when I click in the previews. Not just the “largest preview”, which is uselessly small for fullscreen display.

I can’t believe anyone capable of coding actually took the extra time it must take to screw this up. The rules are really simple -

  1. If rendering a thumbnail, select the closest size that matches or exceeds the size you want,or if > the largest thumbnail, simply use the original).
  2. If rendering the main image, ie. NOT rendering a thumbnail, then use the original image.

I mean, seriously - if it has to generate a 100% resolution thumbnail in order for the f*cking photos app to display a clean image, that really is insane. The image is already there on disk. WTF. Why is NC wasting my disk duplicating the original image?

1 Like