Afraid of going beyond desktop client 2.3.3.1

#1

Hello guys,

Long time user here, I’ve been away the forum for some time, but in practice I was noticing some issues on with newer versions of the client.

I did tried upgrade to the next newer version, but I always returned to the old faithful 2.3.3.1

So I have being choosing the desktop client 2.3.3.1 for long now, even this 2020 if I need to install anything it is 2.3.3.1

A couple of months ago I saw a thread about a new way to sync, cloud drive, digital drive something a long those lines, sorry I’m awful with names.

I know that topic has being a little controversial, so I wonder.

Does new desktop client versions force the new sync model?
Should I stick to 2.3.31 if my main concern is stability?

If I want to use the old way of syncing, is it possible to do with the right client? For how long?

I’ll do my own diligence once I can get into the matter, but any pointers are appreciated.

Regards
Best regards.

#2

not that i know of. at least not yet.

i have upgarded myself ever since, as well… and am ok with the new version. it runs flawlessly so far.

#3

I did that too, but I started to have syncing issues, and mostly I’m syncing 20GB, 30GB, even 50 GB.

So when the issues started appearing, I fallback to 2.3.3.1

I’ll give 2.6 a shot, hopefully the issue time is passed that.

Thanks

1 Like
#4

Hahaha, seems I spoke too soon.

I just meet with this known error.

Seems I’ll be keeping 2.3 around for now.

#5

darn.

have you added your config details there as well? could be helpful.

#6

It’s most likely to be the http/2 issue.

We’ll see.